CadillacSee TIFF on JAM!


November 16, 1997
Jam
Music
Movies
      Actors A-Z
      Movie Reviews
      US Box Office
      Movie Listings
      Watch Classic Films
      Oscars
      TIFF 2011

Television
Video
Theatre
Books
Country




ENT Blog
RSS Feed

MACCA



Free speech is okay as long as no one objects
Howard receives Stern reprimand
By JIM SLOTEK


Sunday, November 16, 1997 By JIM SLOTEK --

Slap! Ow!

That sound you hear is the impact of bruised wrists at Q-107 and Montreal's CHOM-FM, following a decision by the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council that Howard Stern is bad.

Specifically, in a 47-page decision handed down yesterday, the council concluded that Stern's New York-based morning show contravened "both the Canadian Association of Broadcasters Code of Ethics and the CAB Sex-Role Portrayal Code."

What does this mean? On the surface, very little. The CBSC is an organization of private broadcasters. Its members are required to broadcast prepared statements on decisions like the above, but that's as far as it goes.

Q-107 president Don Luzzi says the station will broadcast the prepared statement. "We want to take a hard look at the decision. We've been members of the CBSC since its inception and we have to give this some consideration. Beyond that, we're not prepared to comment."

The "no comment" extended to questions about the future of The Howard Stern Show on Q.

Of particular concern to the Broadcast Standards Council were Stern's remarks about the French on his first Canadian program (and subsequent remarks about Sikhs and Arabs), as well as what the council saw as Stern's "adolescent, puerile, crude attitudes toward sex and gender-related issues ...

"He frequently deals with female guests on the basis of their physical attributes rather than the skills or talents which are the reason for their common recognition. In the case of callers, he regularly avoids the subject with respect to which they have called in order to seek details of their bust size and weight."

As well, the council concluded that "Stern's comments directed at French Canadians, including the terms 'peckerheads,' 'pussy-assed jack-offs,' 'scumbags' and 'pussies', were abusively discriminatory under clause 2 of the Code of Ethics."

The council also expressed concern about the morning timeslot and the possibility of children listening in.

On the other hand, the council -- whose decision was released in response to about 1,000 written complaints -- let Howard off the hook on questions of taste ("Under the present codes, matters of taste must be left to be regulated by the marketplace") and on his statement that the French were cowards during World War II, citing "freedom of expression."


More Artists


HOT MUSIC HEADLINES
Brand suffers migraine attack onstage
Berry kid to be 'American only'?
Robin Wright dating co-star?
Culkin in 'perfectly good health': Rep
Kodak Theatre name in question
Breaking the myths of Disney
Farrelly brother's son, 20, dies
Best bets for Oscar glory in 2012
Cyrus not college bound
'The Vow' a V-Day gift for her
More Headlines
'Journey 2' just plain silly
'Safe House' a safe bet for action
Wilson, Vaughn reunite for comedy
Swinton 'Kevin' role Oscar-worthy
Berry fearing escaped patient?
Watts cast as Princess Diana
'Paradise Lost' film shut down
Berry seeks move out of U.S.
Bullock laughs at dating rumours
Ramsay on her 'domestic thriller'


Who's coming and when
Want to know when your favourite band is coming to town? Check out Clive, JAM Music's extensive Canadian concert listings.

TV Listings
Wondering what's on tonight? Check out our TV listings for the complete schedule in your area.
Movie Listings
Find out what's playing at a theatre near you.






What did you think of Madonna’s halftime show?
She’s still got it
I wasn’t impressed


Results